SpletThe role of the contract administrator will vary depending on the chosen procurement method for constructing the works and the profession of the party adopting such role. Broadly, according to the leading case of Sutcliffe v Thackrah (1974), his functions will fall within two distinct camps. SpletSutcliffe Appellant v Thackrah and Others Respondents Content 727 Sutcliffe Appellant v Thackrah and Others Respondents House of Lords 12 February 1974 Lord Reid , Lord …
9 THE CERTIFICATION PROCESS
SpletFryer v Sturt (1855) 16 CB 218; 139 ER 740 743 Gett v Tabet (2009) 254 ALR 504; [2009] NSWCA 76 Gould v Vaggelas (1985) 157 CLR 215 ... Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Lincoln City Council [1998] 4 All ER 513, [1999] 2 AC 349 Lactos Fresh Pty Ltd v Finishing Services Pty Ltd (No 2) [2006] FCA 748 ... Sutcliffe v Thackrah [1974] AC 727 The Autothrepetic ... SpletFurther, it has also been held in the New Zealand case of New Zealand Structures and Investments Ltd v. McKenzie 48 that the Engineer/Architect had the power to 39 [1964] … farkas névnap
Expert Determination of Construction Disputes: The Pros and Cons
SpletIn the case of Sutcliffe -v- Thackrah [1974 AC 727) it was held that "it is well settled that . . . witnesses enjoy an absolute immunity from any form of civil action being brought against them in respect of anything they say or do in court during the course of a trial". Accordingly an expert will not be amenable to any action against him for ... Splet03. nov. 2024 · Exercising reasonable care and skill: The case of Sutcliffe v Thackrah is mentioned above and is an example of the ways in which decisions and actions of the … Splet12. sep. 2024 · Sutcliffe v Thackrah and Others: HL 1974 In acting under clause 66 of the ICE conditions, the Engineer was in the intermediate position of a quasi-arbitrator. The … hnd diploma in sri lanka