Dynamic logic for belief revision

WebJul 21, 2024 · Abstract. We propose a dynamic hyperintensional logic of belief revision for non-omniscient agents, reducing the logical omniscience phenomena affecting standard … WebDYNAMIC HYPERINTENSIONAL BELIEF REVISION - Volume 14 Issue 3. We propose a dynamic hyperintensional logic of belief revision for non-omniscient agents, reducing the logical omniscience phenomena affecting standard doxastic/epistemic logic as well as AGM belief revision theory.

Cautious Distributed Belief

WebFlorida State University; Computer Science Dept. Love Bldg. Tallahassee, FL; United States WebCourse Description: This course looks at the use of modal, temporal and dynamic logics to reason about knowledge, belief, their dynamics, agency and intention, and some aspects of game theory. Many of the course readings come from the Multiagent Systems textbook, which is available online. Note that the course is not intended as a general ... greater washington metropolitan area https://bridgetrichardson.com

Johan van Benthem, Dynamic logic for belief revision - PhilPapers

WebKEYWORDS: dynamic epistemic logic, belief revision, conditional belief, compositionality 1. Information Update and Belief Revision Belief revisiontheoryinAGMstyle ([GAR 87], … WebApr 13, 2012 · We show how belief revision can be treated systematically in the format of dynamicepistemic logic, when operators of conditional belief are added. The core engine consists of definable update rules for changing plausibility relations between worlds, which have been proposed independently in the dynamic-epistemic literature on preference … flip cell phone covers

Deontic-doxastic belief revision and linear system model - PMC

Category:Deontic-doxastic belief revision and linear system model

Tags:Dynamic logic for belief revision

Dynamic logic for belief revision

[PDF] Dynamic logic for belief revision Semantic Scholar

WebThis paper shows how propositional dynamic logic (PDL) can be interpreted as a logic for multi-agent belief revision and shows that the update part of this logic is more expressive than either that of LCC or that of doxastic/epistemic PDL with a belief change modality. This paper shows how propositional dynamic logic (PDL) can be interpreted as a logic for … WebApr 4, 2024 · Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for R-CALCULUS: A Logic of Belief Revision by Wei Li (English) Paperback Book at the best online prices at eBay! Free shipping for many products!

Dynamic logic for belief revision

Did you know?

WebJan 1, 2014 · We present a logical setting that incorporates a belief-revision mecha-nism within Dynamic-Epistemic logic. As the "static" basis for belief revision, we use epistemic plausibility models ... Web2008. TLDR. This paper shows how propositional dynamic logic (PDL) can be interpreted as a logic for multi-agent belief revision and shows that the update part of this logic is more expressive than either that of LCC or that of doxastic/epistemic PDL with a belief change modality. 43. PDF.

Webfor LCC. The treatment of conditional belief derives from [11]. Our work can be seen as a proposal for integrating belief revision by means of relation sub-stitution, as proposed in [7] with belief and knowledge update in the style of [3]. 2 PDL as a Belief Revision Logic A preference model M for set of agents Ag and set of basic propositions Prop WebAbstract Dynamic epistemic logic, broadly conceived, is the study of rational so-cial interaction in context, the study, that is, of how agents update their knowledge ... can be viewed (or: reinterpreted) as a logic of belief revision, in [28], and as a multi-agent strategy logic, in [27]. However, this cannot be the whole story. This ...

WebJan 1, 2007 · Dynamic logic for belief revision. J. van Benthem. Published 1 January 2007. Philosophy. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics. We show how belief … WebAug 11, 2024 · IntroductionThe article presents a doxastic-nested-deontic formalization of epistemic deontology (Feldman, 2000; Forrai, 2024) for static and dynamic belief …

WebApr 21, 2006 · Logic of Belief Revision. First published Fri Apr 21, 2006; substantive revision Tue Dec 21, 2024. In the logic of belief revision (belief change), a belief state (or database) is represented by a set of …

Webof belief revision, based on compositional reduction axioms. Next, we show how various ab-stract postulates for belief revision can be analyzed by standard modal frame … greater washington new york lifeWebbetween knowledge and belief of the speaker: he is the observer of the system and his beliefs are taken to be the truth by the listeners. We provide a sketch of what goes on logically when a lie is communicated. We present a complete logic of manipulative updating, to analyse the effects of lying in public discourse. Next, flip cell phone at\u0026tWebDec 31, 2006 · PDF - We show how belief revision can be treated systematically in the format of dynamicepistemic logic, when operators of conditional belief are added. The … greater washington partnership ceoWebApr 10, 2008 · For the implementation of belief revision, however, one has to consider that any realistic agent is a finite being and that calculations take time. In this article, we introduce a new operation for revising beliefs which we call reinforcement belief revision. The computational model for this operation allows us to assess it in terms of time and ... greater washington orthopaedic groupWebJan 1, 2007 · While belief change has been extensively studied in the area of belief revision [1,15,20,46,42,13] and dynamic epistemic logic (DEL) [47, 10,51,4], desire … greater washington orthopedic rockville mdWebLiu (2008) looks at a quantitative version of preference and preference change closely related to earlier work on belief revision by Aucher (2003). Yamada (2007a,b, 2008) examines various deontic logics of action, command, and obligation. Van Eijck (2008) looks at a generalized Propositional Dynamic Logic-style preference logic that encompasses ... greater washington orthopedic group rockvilleWebThere are related (and slightly competing) systems of reasoning that are newer than systems of defeasible reasoning, e.g., belief revision and dynamic logic. The dialogue logics of Charles Hamblin and Jim Mackenzie, and their colleagues, can also be tied closely to defeasible reasoning. Belief revision is a non-constructive specification of the ... greater washington partnership address